By Andrea Shalal and Humeyra Pamuk SCHLOSS ELMAU, Germany (Reuters) – NATO’s first new strategy concept in a decade will cite China as a concern for the first time but member states remain at odds over how to describe the country with the world’s largest military and its relationship with Russia, NATO diplomats say. Both […]
‘Systemic challenge’ or worse? NATO members debate over how to treat China
By Andrea Shalal and Humeyra Pamuk
SCHLOSS ELMAU, Germany (Reuters) – NATO’s first new strategy concept in a decade will cite China as a concern for the first time but member states remain at odds over how to describe the country with the world’s largest military and its relationship with Russia, NATO diplomats say.
Both a summit of the G7 rich industrial democracies now underway in Germany and a NATO summit to follow will tackle China’s deepening ties with Russia after Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine, and what is seen as the growing inclination of China to flex its geopolitical muscle and coercive economic might abroad.
The new strategic concept to be endorsed at the NATO summit in Madrid on Wednesday and Thursday will address increasing threats posed by Russia and, for the first time, China, the world’s second largest economy, U.S. officials said last week.
A White House official voiced confidence on Sunday that the document would include “strong” language on China, but said the negotiations were continuing ahead of the NATO summit in Madrid on June 29-30.
NATO diplomats said the United States and Britain have pushed for more forceful language to reflect what they see as China’s increasing military ambitions and growing concern that it could attack the democratically governed island of Taiwan, which Beijing regards as its own territory.
France and Germany – given major European industrial investment in China – meanwhile favour more measured references, said the NATO diplomats, who spoke on condition of anonymity since the document was still being finalized.
One diplomat said a compromise was taking shape under which China would be described as a “systemic challenge”, while including balancing language referring to a “willingness to work on areas of common interest” with Beijing.
The strategy document, which will update U.S.-led NATO’s objectives and values, will also state member states’ “awareness of the need for “resilience”, the diplomat said.
Negotiators are in addition fine-tuning how to describe the relationship between China and Russia, with the Czech Republic and Hungary strongly opposed to the phrase “strategic convergence” to define it, one of the diplomats said.
CHINA’S ‘GLOBAL AMBITIONS’
NATO officials are racing to complete the strategic concept in time for the Madrid summit, where the Russian invasion of Ukraine will take centre stage.
Britain recently adopted language describing Russia as an “acute, direct threat” and China as a “strategic challenge.”
The Pentagon’s latest annual report to the U.S. Congress underscored the importance of “meeting the pacing challenge presented by the People’s Republic of China’s increasingly capable military and its global ambitions”.
U.S. officials stressed the importance of including China in NATO’s updated strategic concept, and Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea were therefore invited to the NATO summit for the first time.
The point was to signal that NATO is not “taking our eye off the ball in China” even as it focuses on strengthening Ukraine’s defences, one of the officials said. “It’s firmed up the democratic world on both Russia and China.”
“NATO can’t afford to ignore China,” agreed a European official. “Europe was a bit behind in recognising this, but views have definitely shifted in light of Hong Kong,” referring to Beijing’s security crackdown on the Asian financial hub.
A third official said: “We tried to build an era of being nice and incentivising China and we got President Xi (Jinping),” the Chinese leader who critics say has taken China on a more authoritarian path at home and aggressive course abroad. “So I think most people would think a different approach is needed.”
Alluding to NATO’s original mission to counter Russian threats to the West, He added: “NATO’s area of operation is simply north of the Tropic of Cancer. It has no eastern or western limits. So I think it’s fair that NATO looks at that.”
(Reporting by Andrea Shalal and Humeyra Pamuk, editing by Mark Heinrich)